Introduction
Life in captivity differs enormously from life in the wild or in free-ranging situations. In some ways, captivity is better (it typically
involves protection from drought, starvation, predation and illness);
but captivity often prevents natural behaviour patterns like foraging
ranging, mate choice, and certain aspects of maternal care. The
prevention of natural behaviour can cause frustration and stress. In
young animals, it can also disrupt the proper development of
forebrain structure and function. We are interested in
understanding when and why this happens.
In particular, we want to
understand:
- Which natural behaviour patterns are important for
welfare, and how does this vary with species?
- Which natural
behaviour patterns are needed to guarantee normal brain
development, and is this linked to their role in welfare?
- Why do
different species, strains and individuals vary in their abilities to
cope with captivity?
- And can we use this knowledge to:
- identify
those genotypes most likely to thrive in captivity?
- selectively
breed animals that are well-adapted to typical captive conditions?
- modify early experience in ways that lead to stress-resistant
phenotypes?
Read about specific ongoing projects in the group.
Overview
Working on everything from mice to elephants, our approaches
range from the analysis of large datasets (e.g. those compiled by
industry or built up by us from data in published literature), to
running experiments to investigate the effects of, say, weaning age
or particular environmental enrichments. Typically we quantify such
changes using well-validated non-invasive techniques, some of
which we have developed ourselves.
Currently our main focusing is stereotypic behaviour – an abnormal
activity performed in response to captivity by hundreds of millions
of animals worldwide (see recent book for more details) We
study how and why these behaviours develop by combining
techniques for measuring motivations to perform natural
behaviours with techniques for non-invasively assessing changes
in how the forebrain sequences behaviour (e.g. perseveration).
Much of our experimental work is on the American mink, a semi-
domesticated carnivore farmed for its fur, and an ideal 'model carnivore'. This work is done in collaboration with local fur farmers,
and also with Professor Steve Bursian at Michigan State University, where PhD student María Díez León
has built enriched ‘mink palaces’ featuring tunnels, climbing
towers, hammocks, toys and wading pools.
We also work with mice, since many millions of these animals are
used each year in research. Some of our mouse work is in
collaboration with the Jackson Laboratory, the largest producer of
GM mice in North America, some has been in collaboration with Harlan
UK, another major laboratory
animal supplier, and the rest is done in the CFI-funded lab. Georgia
is setting up in Guelph. By spring 2009, this will feature modular
cages that can slot together to make mouse enclosures up to 7200
cm2 in area; cameras for recording stereotypic behaviour; sound
equipment to record and play back ultrasonic mouse calls;
apparatuses to run conventional neurobiological tests for anxiety
(elevated plus maze, acoustic startle); and even equipment for
detecting the heart rate of mice through the soles of their feet!
For science media coverage of our past work, see National
Geographic; New Scientist May 24 2008; Nature vol. 433; Nature vol.
412; Discover Magazine, 24 (July 2003); New Scientist March 2001;
New Scientist Jan. 26 2002 (cover story); Science vol. 298; Trends in
Neurosciences vol. 24; and Nature vol. 410.
|