Class, race played significant role in experience of drug users, historian says
BY REBECCA KENDALL
Controlling illegal drug use through harsh restrictions and tough penalties was as much an issue 80 or 90 years ago as it is today, according to a new book by Prof. Catherine Carstairs, History.
Jailed for Possession: Illegal Drug Use, Regulation and Power in Canada, 1920 to 1961 looks at why Canada passed extremely harsh drug laws in the 1920s and what impact those laws had on the lives of users.
“It also helps us understand contemporary drug laws and public perceptions of drug users,” Carstairs says.
She notes that class and race played a significant role in the experience of drug users during the period she studied and that methods for controlling drug use were hotly debated topics.
Although opiates were once widely used in Canada through patent medicines, they were removed from the list of allowed ingredients by the turn of the 20th century. By the early 1920s, the practice of using opiates for relaxation and pain relief was morally rejected by most white Canadians and drug use was labelled a Chinese problem, says Carstairs.
People also blamed the Chinese for drug smuggling and trafficking, and worried that drugs were causing young women to prostitute themselves, spread venereal disease and have sex with Asian men, she says. As a result, new laws were passed leading to six-month penalties for possession and deportation.
“This had dramatic effects on drug use and the lives of users,” says Carstairs, who notes that few doctors wanted users as patients and treatment was almost non-existent.
Diligent police work meant drugs became more expensive and harder to come by. By the 1930s, users were spending more and more time travelling around the country in search of a “fix,” were resorting to crime more frequently to finance their habit and had developed less detectable but more dangerous ways to use drugs, including injecting opiates intravenously instead of smoking them, she says. They also became caught in a cycle of imprisonment.
“Although tough sentencing reduced the number of users, it had severely detrimental effects on the health, employment and relationships of those who continued to use.”
Police began to closely monitor doctors to ensure they weren't prescribing opium to known users, says Carstairs, but doctors who were users themselves were treated far more leniently.
“There are numerous accounts of doctors who prescribed themselves opiates yet never saw the inside of a jail cell. Their wealth and status allowed their use to go undetected, but at the same time, it was difficult to be a working-class user and not come to the attention of the police within a very short time.”
Today, there are far more users and many more drugs on the market, says Carstairs. International drug trade has also increased, and policing it all is far more difficult. But the early period of enforcement described in her book shows that the negative outcomes outweigh the positive ones when it comes to harsh drug enforcement. Instead of imprisonment, there is a need for a broader array of treatments, including maintenance programs, she says.
Carstairs will give a talk on “From Opium Dens to Overdoses: The Impact of Harsh Drug Legislation on the Lives of Users” at the Feb. 7 meeting of the Guelph Historical Society. The meeting begins at 7:30 p.m. at St Andrew's Church.
