Features
Human Behaviour at Petting Zoos Poses Health Risk
Few zoo visitors wash their hands, OVC study finds
BY LORI BONA HUNT
People visiting petting zoos may be bringing home more than memories of friendly rabbits, sheep and goats. They may also be carrying pathogens such as E. coli and Salmonella because few people wash their hands after a visit or take other precautions to protect themselves from zoonotic agents, according to a new study by U of G researchers.
“Petting zoos can be an excellent educational and social event, but there are potential health risks that are not always being properly addressed,” says Prof. Scott Weese of the Department of Clinical Studies, who recently headed the most comprehensive study to date on the practices of petting zoos in Ontario.
“They pose risk of exposure to pathogens that can jump from animals to humans,” he says. “These organisms can make their way into a human visitor's mouth and then cause serious illness.”
The research is scheduled to be published in the July 1 edition of the Journal of Infectious Disease and is available now online.
Although petting zoos are commonplace, there has been minimal evaluation of their practices, says Weese. His study examined 36 petting zoos in Ontario between May and October 2006. Information was collected on the zoos' layout, the types of animals present and the permitted animal contact, manure removal, hand hygiene facilities and location of food vendors.
The researchers uncovered numerous problems, including infrequent hand washing, food being sold and consumed near the animals, and children being allowed to drink from bottles or suck on pacifiers in the petting area.
“Even though nearly all the zoos provided hand hygiene facilities, on average only 30 per cent of people washed or disinfected their hands after leaving a petting zoo,” says Weese.
“This is concerning because hands are the most likely route of transmission of infectious agents from petting zoos, and hand washing is the most protective measure people can take.”
The worrisome bacteria can live in the intestinal tracts of some animals and are shed in the animals' feces, he says.
In addition, food or beverages were observed in the petting zoos 82 per cent of the time. And at more than half of the zoos, items that would come into contact with the mouths of infants and children were carried into the animal area, he says.
“It was a common occurrence to see people with items such as baby bottles, pacifiers and baby toys in the petting zoo, which is of concern because babies are at higher risk of acquiring certain zoonotic diseases.”
Weese notes that risk can be significantly reduced by taking some simple measures, including locating hand-washing stations at the exit of a petting zoo, posting signs promoting good hygiene, and educating people about the risks of bringing food, beverages or items that may end up in a child's mouth into the zoo.
Other OVC researchers who worked on the study are Lisa McCarthy, Michael Mossop and Hayley Martin of the Department of Clinical Studies and Sandra Lefebvre of the Department of Population Medicine.