It is heartwarming to know that a significant majority of Canadians want Canada to be able to respond more effectively to the challenges of poverty around the world and want to be able to respond more effectively to humanitarian crises.
In fact, we have shown this heart in very dramatic ways: the Asian tsunami was followed by the largest contributions of private aid from Canadians and we have responded rapidly to the subsequent natural disasters in Burma and China. The Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) - a government agency that is often castigated for being to slow to respond and risk averse - has developed an effective matching program for private aid and it is probably one of the better agencies in the world at disbursing the funds for immediate release when a disaster occurs.
Last spring, despite the very contentious nature of our divided national parliament, there was all-party support for a private member's Bill on improving the effectiveness of Canadian aid. The new Bill will ensure that monies are directed more rapidly toward alleviating poverty and that Canada will promotes human rights and civil society in determining its aid priorities. This is groundbreaking legislation and we should be proud that our parties have taken this action.
This week, celebrating three years since the signing of the 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, ministers from over a hundred countries will meet in Accra (Ghana) to review our progress on aid effectiveness. They will be joined by heads of development agencies, donor organizations and leaders of civil society organizations from around the globe. Canada has played a leading role in advocating for a stronger acceptance of the view that promoting and achieving civil society is the cornerstone of building lasting development solutions that will combat poverty, disease and war. This was not always a popular or accepted position but it is clear from the people attending this meeting in Accra that the international community now recognizes the importance of civil society. They have invited representatives from humanitarian organizations, foundations, advocacy groups, grass-roots groups, churches, universities and other non-government actors that can contribute towards ending poverty and alleviating suffering to be part of the dialogue. This is a very significant step forward.
In Canada, and particularly among non-government agencies, there has been a tendency to criticize CIDA. It is important to recognize that CIDA officials have worked tirelessly with groups and associations and their counterparts from around the world to emphasis the importance of the role that civil society. They have long advocated that civil society plays a key role in the fostering effective development and in restoring dignity to those affected by the scourges of pest, plague and pestilence.
There remains an incredible amount of work to be done but we should feel proud of our desire as Canadians to be involved in humanitarian efforts and we have reason to celebrate the contributions of our political parties and CIDA. CIDA has faced incredible challenges: in the last six years there have been three governments, four Ministers, four presidents of the Agency and three major policy reviews. Imagine how much more successful CIDA could be in bringing about change and truly making long-lasting solutions if only they could have a period of stability at home.