Physiological,
Evolutionary and
Functional Ecology
Our research is focused on identifying the causes of physiological
adaptation and its consequences for ecological processes at the
population, community and ecosystem levels. Because plant
physiology strongly influences ecosystem function, predicting the
course of physiological evolution is necessary to evaluate how
ecosystem functions and services will be affected in the long-term by
human influences on the abiotic and biotic environment. We use model
species and systems to answer basic questions in physiological and
evolutionary ecology and utilize ongoing biological invasions and
climate change experiments to explore how physiology and
evolution can shape the assembly of communities and the
functioning of ecosystems.
What are the causes of physiological adaptation to the abiotic
environment? Because
they are sessile, plants are vulnerable to many forms of abiotic and
biotic stress. Of these potential stressors, water and nutrient
limitation are ubiquitous, highly variable across space and time, and
the most limiting to plant growth and net primary production in many
environments. Although physiological variation along these resource
gradients is often assumed to be adaptive, much of the evidence to
support this assumption is indirect, i.e., it is derived from
correlations between trait and abiotic resource variation. We use
ecological genetic and phylogenetic tools to directly identify the
causes of physiological adaptation and targets of natural
selection.
Research Questions:
1. Which physiological traits are the targets of
natural selection in contrasting resource environments and how does
selection on physiology vary across time and space?
2. In which kinds of environments does physiological plasticity evolve?
3. How does shared evolutionary history influence physiological adaptation?
4. How is physiological evolution constrained by the
amount of genetic variation and genetic correlations among traits in
populations?
5. How do whole genome duplication events in the
history of angiosperms (polyploidy) influence the evolution of
physiology?
Collaborators: Christina Caruso (UG), Brian Husband (UG), Robert Latta (Dalhousie).
Postdoctoral Fellow: Patrick Vogan.
Undergraduate Students: Nigel Gale.
How
does plant function evolve in the context of ecological communities? The resource requirements and physiological tolerances of organisms
change when they interact with competitors, predators, parasites and
mutualists, suggesting that abiotic and biotic agents of selection
interact to influence physiological adaptation. However, these
perspectives are disconnected in theories of physiological adaptation
and are rarely examined together in empirical studies. We use
comparative phylogenetic, experimental and field studies to examine how
interactions between mutualistic and antagonistic biotic components and
the abiotic environment influence physiological evolution. We are especially interested in how interactions with arbuscular
mycorrhizal (AM) fungi shape the function and evolution of plants.
Research Questions:
1. What are the physiological mechanisms responsible
for variation in plant responsiveness to AM fungi and other soil biota?
2. How do interactions with soil biota influence the
evolution of plant physiology? How do these interactions change
with resource availability?
3. How do invasive species shape the physiological
evolution of native species? How will these evolutionary
responses influence community structure?
Postdoctoral Fellow: Patrick Vogan.
Graduate Student: Gary Poon.
Undergraduate Student: Emily Upham-Mills.
How do functional traits, interactions with mutualists, and evolutionary history affect the assembly
of communities and the functioning of ecosystems? A
major goal in ecology is to discover mechanisms of community
assembly. One hypothesis that accounts for non-random community
assembly is competition. If species share a fundamental niche, then
competitive exclusion will
cause communities to be made up of species that have disimilar
functional traits. If these functional traits are
phylogenetically conserved, then species will also be more distantly
related to each other than would be
expected by chance (phylogenetically even). Though competition has long
been considered an important ecological process, competitive exclusion
is rare in communities, which suggests that other processes such as
trophic interactions and habitat filtering also shape community
structure. We are examining how plant interactions with communities of
AM fungi influence competition and co-existence in both fungal and
plant communties.
Research Questions:
1. How do functional traits and character evolution
influence the assembly of AM fungal communities on plant roots?
2. How are competitive interactions among plants
influenced by fungal mediated affects on resource uptake and abiotic
tolerances?
Collaborator: John Klironomos (UBC).
Graduate Students: Gary Poon, Sabina Stanescu.
How do mutualisms influence community dynamics
and the functioning of
ecosystems? In a recently (2007) established large scale field
experiment, we are tracking the ecological impacts of 31 different
cultivars of three grass species (perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and
meadow fescue) on native grasslands. Experimental plots have been
invaded with grass cultivars that are either endophyte-free,
endophyte-infected, or in some cases infected by ‘novel
endophytes’. We are examining how the experimental treatments
affect the assembly of communities, successional dynamics, and
ecosystem functioning.
Collaborators: Jonathan Newman (UG), John Klironomos (UBC), Kathryn Yurkonis (UND).
Undergraduate Student: Emily Drystek.
The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
The Canada Foundation for Innovation
Website modified from a design by Bartosz Brzezinski (oswd.org)
Made with KompoZer (http://kompozer.net/)