Contact Me
 
  HomeProfessional PracticeResearchTestimonialsLinks  

 

Graduate Studies Home
Learning Narrative
Learning Contract
Research Project Description
Reading List
Annotated Bibliography

Literature Review

Annotated Bibliography

Foundations

Caffarella, R. S. (2001). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide for educators, trainers, and staff developers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

This guidebook tries to include all the skills, roles and tasks that any educator, educational or meeting planner, or program planner could find useful and applicable. Caffarella presents a model of program planning that is holistic, comprehensive, and flexible. She includes not only all the educational components of planning programs, including lesson planning, learning objectives, and instructional techniques. She also includes some of the more logistical or administrative tasks and roles as well. She writes about budgeting, developing organizational support, and report writing. The book includes worksheets at the end of each chapter to help in application. Caffarella blends the practical and theoretical in a very effective manner. The book is well-written, clear, and organized. I liked this book so much that I incorporated it in a continuing education course that I facilitated on training and development.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. NY: Continuum.

This classic book seeks to set education in a social context and as a tool of personal, social, and political liberation. Freire uses as a foundation his experiences with illiterate peasants in Brazil. The book’s main thesis seems to be that, through education, humans can become more skilled in understanding themselves in their social context. There were several key concepts that rang particularly true for me. One strong point Freire makes is how education is never neutral; educators oppress or liberate. Another interesting idea is that those who are oppressed must liberate themselves, and, in so doing, also liberate the oppressors. Relevant to my specific area of study is how critical reflection and praxis are key in re-humanizing both the oppressed and oppressors. This book is heavily jargonized and a bit dated in terms of its context. However, every line is worth deciphering due to the plethora of interesting concepts put forth. This is a must-read for all adult educators (and others).

Johnston, R. (1992). Evaluation: the problem that won’t go away. International Journal of University Adult Education. 31:1, p. 63-74.

The article reviews evaluation and the problems that arise therein. The author starts by describing some of the difficulties of evaluation and why it is not always looked upon favourably. She then discusses the downfalls of summative evaluation and advocates for a formative approach so that the participants benefit directly from the feedback received. Johnson also advocates for re-thinking how we evaluate in that most evaluation is directed towards individuals, whereas ‘in reality’ most efforts are a part of collaborative or collective action. This article seems directed towards formal educational institiutions, rather than continuing professional education. This is a relatively basic article, seemingly directly to those new to the area of evaluation.

Merriam, S.B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Self-directed learning. In Learning in adulthood (pp.288-317). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

The authors write an extensive introduction and overview of the goals, models, learner attributes and the gaps in literature as they related to self-directed learning (sdl). This somewhat lengthy, overly-detailed article describes all of the major models of sdl, categorized by type. They also discuss the responses and criticisms to each model, exposing their strengths and weaknesses. I really appreciated that the authors spend a part of the article critiquing the lack of research into sdl, and they list a number of research questions that they believe would enlighten our knowledge of sdl. This article goes into more detail than most introductory articles, but for those determined to seriously explore sdl, this is a good place to start.

Taylor, E. (1998). Transformative Learning Theory—An Overview. In The theory and practice of transformative learning: A critical review. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved January 21, 2002 from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED423422)

This monograph describes, through a review of the literature, the key theories of transformative learning. Most of the focus is on the theory articulated by Mezirow. The author then compares the concepts Mezirow to Robert Boyd’s concept of transformation as individuation and to Paolo Freire’s emancipatory transformation. Chock full of the important details of the three concepts of transformation, this is an excellent summary for anyone starting to explore transformational learning.

Vella, J. (1994). Learning to Listen Learning to Teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Vella has written this easy-reading book, focussing on her experiences in community development and adult education, primarily in other cultures. She proposes twelve principles for effective adult learning, and describes how these principles inform course design and teaching. Her examples are sometimes uni-dimensional and lacking in the measurement of the impact of the interventions which she describes. The twelve principles presented are helpful and well-substantiated. Her examples may be helpful in integrating the principles into my own practice as well as others.

Vella, J., Berardinelli, P., & Burrow, J. (1998). How do they know they know? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

The authors strongly advocate a process for integrating evaluation into the design and delivery of any educational offering. They discuss learning, transfer and impact as the three components of evaluation. The elements are approached in terms of key elements, process to complete, and timing. They also focus an accountability planner, which is a tool to be used to determine what can be evaluated, and how appropriate evaluation can be determined. This model embraces the popular education approach to education and is participative and specific. They then use three examples to demonstrate how the approach advocated can better ensure effective evaluation. This is a simple read, short, concise and beneficial to anyone who might be interested in improving their ability to evaluate any educational offering.

Critical Reflection - General

Ahlstrand, E., & Nilsson, K. (1999). Preparing to become a reflective practitioner. A Swedish perspective. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved January 27, 2001, from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED430928)

The authors describe a first attempt at integrating reflective practices into teacher training in Sweden. Using seminars, mentoring and writing reflective texts in the creation of personal plans of action, they summarize some of the comments of the teachers after going through the process. Shallow in content and in reporting of the impact of the study, the authors add little to the discussion of enhancing teaching abilities using critical reflection. This is one read that can easily be left out of any reading list.

Bailey, J. R., Saparito, P., Kressel, K. Christenson, E., & Hooijberg, R. (1997). A model for reflective pedagogy. Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 155-167.

The authors describe a study of a model of reflective pedagogy implemented with business school instructors at Rutgers University. Based on the writings of Donald Schön (that is, the concepts of surprise, frustration and failure as well as dialogue between mentor/novice), the study incorporates strategies to assist the instructor in developing ‘professional artistry’; to transcend the rules and conventions of a profession, via reflection, to solve unique problems by reshaping past experiences in order to interpret the situation and take action. The strategies used in the study include the development of a teaching portfolio, obtaining systematic student feedback, and attending a reflective practitioner workshop. The article is shallow in the depth its findings, as well as inarticulate as to the rationale for the choice of strategies used to help develop reflective practices. This article is useful only as a relatively small and inconclusive piece of a larger investigation into reflective pedagogy.

Boud, E. M., & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, (23)2, 99-115.

The authors describe the process and focus of developing critically reflective skills. Based on research of nine practitioners, they extrapolate much from a relatively small sample. The article is unique in that most others related to critical reflection discuss the concept of critical reflection or techniques to help develop such skills. The authors of this article focus on the process of the development of criticallyeflective practices. Though unclear as to the difference between the processes and the focuses they discuss, this article illuminates how one might develop conscious critical reflection. Because of the uniqueness of the content of this article, it is an excellent resource for anyone developing their own or fostering others’ reflective abilities.

Brookfield, S. D. (1992).  Uncovering assumptions: The key to re flective practice. Adult Learning, 3(4), 13-18.

The author describes four generic exercises designed to uncover hidden assumptions. This is a short and succinct article that is practical and applied. The exercises seem to be minor variations on each other, which may be indicative of the specific conditions required to encourage critical reflection in formal education. Similar to his other articles, I found this one very useful and practical. I will definitely use at least one of the exercises, or a variation thereof, in the courses that I design and deliver. There is not much theory presented, or rationale for the need for uncovering assumptions. For these reasons, the audience that would most benefit from this article is those already aware of the concept and issues related to reflexivity and looking for practical ways to integrate critical reflection into course design and delivery.

Brookfield, S. D. (1994).  Tales from the dark side:  A phenomenography of adult critical reflection.  International Journal of Lifelong Education, 13(3), 203-216.

This article is a reality check for those looking at integrating critical reflection into curricula. Based on the study of graduate adult educators at a major American university, Brookfield identifies some of the potential emotional obstacles those reflecting critically might encounter. He discusses the negative emotional impacts of starting down the road of critical reflection. Specifically, he identifies impostorship, cultural suicide, lost innocence, and roadrunning as some of the emotions experienced by those in the study. He also discusses the importance of community in supporting those on this journey. He advocates for the full disclosure of the potential pitfalls of reflecting critically to those embarking on the journey of developing critical reflection skills. This is an important article in that it is one of the few that discusses the negative impacts of reflecting critically and thus is a must-read.

 Brookfield, S. D. (2000). The concept of critically reflective practice. In A. L. Wilson and E.R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 33-49). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brookfield provides an overview of the philosophical perspectives that frame the variety of definitions and foci of critical reflection as they relate to adult education. Being very clear about his own perspective, Brookfield interestingly illustrates the practice of critical reflection by critically reflecting on the concept itself, thereby illuminating some of the underlying principles that may be problematic. He argues that although there are inherent problems with critical reflection, without self-examination of adult education practices, we risk moving further away from some of the very goals most embraced by the profession (inclusion, collaboration and democracy). With critical reflection, however, we can become more understanding of individual experience and context, and how “universal templates” of adult education practices can be limiting. This is a clearly written and organized primer for understanding issues related to critical reflection and is an excellent starting point to delve into this broad topic area. 

Cervero, R.M. & Wilson, A.L. (2001). At the heart of practice: The struggle for knowledge and power. In Power and practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society (pp.1-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

The authors present this article as an introduction to the rest of the articles in the book. The primary message is that adult education cannot be neutral politically. Power in adult education can be categorized in three specific strands, based on a review of the existing literature. ‘Politics as personal’ views the individual learner as the focus and in which issues of power are largely invisible. ‘Politics as practical’ acknowledges the power issues, but focuses on working within systems of politics to accomplish end goals. ‘Politics as structural’ sees education relationally but also to reshape these systems to a more just and equitable life for all people. This is well-written and a good primer for those new to issues of power and politics in adult education.

Cervero, R.M. & Wilson, A.L. (1999). Beyond learner-centered practice: Adult education, power, and society. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, (13)2, 27-38.

This article is almost identical to “At the heart of practice: The struggle for knowledge and power” by the same authors. I read the other article first, so my response to this one was distaste, even though this article was written first. The authors discuss the three strands of understanding how adult educators respond to issues of power: personal, practical and structural. They strongly advocate a move away from a learner-centered model, the personal strand, to one which recognizes the power issues that provide the context for the learners. I would definitely recommend either this article or the other mentioned. I would not suggest that both the articles are necessary due to the duplication.

Critical Thinking Consortium. (n.d). Retrieved January 27, 2002 from http://www.criticalthinking.org.

This website is a repository of short articles related to critical thinking and its application to k-12, colleges and universities, and business. These sections largely contain the same articles available in other sections of the site, with no additional or specific articles to make it worthwhile to go to different sections. The articles are generally very short, and lack the depth that would be desired by anyone with more than a basic knowledge of critical thinking. There is also a series of related books and articles for sale on the site. The site is well-organized and easy to read and navigate. This would be a good site for those new to the concepts surrounding critical thinking, who are looking for easily digestible nuggets of content.

Freidus, H. (2000). Fostering reflective practice: taking a look at context. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved February 21, 2002 from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED441787).

This paper describes strategies and techniques used at the Bank Street College of Education to develop reflective practices with graduate students. The techniques and rationale for each one used are clearly laid out and appear well thought out as well. The primary techniques discussed include journalling and the development of teaching portfolios, both under the guidance of faculty advisors. They seem to focus on the development of critical reflection throughout the programme, but especially within the students’ fieldwork experience. They are clear that the process of developing critical practices is both individual and communal. If I were developing a programme of study related to teacher education, I would closely examine the Bank Street model as it seems comprehensive and holistic.

Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 1-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

The author approaches the concept, process, and impact of reflection from a transformational learning perspective, in which adults come to realize how childhood experiences limit development and therefore must be re-framed as adults. This article serves as the foundational reading to subsequent chapters in this theme-oriented book. The reading, unavoidably laden with definitions and concepts related to reflection, learning, and transformation, might have to be read several times by newcomers to the topic. In spite of (or rather, because of) the technical language used, this article is a good place to start in the investigation of transformative learning and the role reflection plays in that process.

Mezirow, J. (1994). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This book makes a strong conceptual and practical argument for learning to be a life-altering experience. Reading this book provided me with a different and transformative perspective on my role as an adult educator. To be truly effective, an educator must provide more than the skills and knowledge to perform more effectively. He or she must foster the ability to critically reflective, not just develop, on the knowledge, skills or attitudes be taught. I found the first half of this book to be a bit too conceptual for my liking. However, the second half of the book was much more concrete and practical. This is a must read for adult educators looking to move beyond the fostering of basic knowledge, skills, and attitudes and to helping learners transform through education.

 Mezirow, J. (1998). On critical reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, (48)3, 185-197.

The author presents an overview of the types of critical reflection of assumptions (cra) and critical self-reflection of assumptions (csra). He reviews the various categories of cra and csra. Mezirow provides the historical and foundational basis for critical reflection in adult education. This would seem to be a seminal article in grasping the diverse range of implications and applications of cra and csra. Not an easy read, as it is quite technical in language, it is still a worthwhile article for those interested in understanding the basics of critical reflection and its value in adult education.

Nichols, M. (2003). Reflection: Relevance and consequence. In Teaching for learning (pp.107-127). New Zealand: Traininc.co.nz

This chapter is one of the most useful readings I have done on the theory and practice of critical reflection in academic settings. Concise, well-researched, and practical, the author lays a solid foundation of the concept and benefits of reflection. Nichols also makes a particularly strong argument for the need to link interaction with reflection. The chapter describes concepts clearly, and adds many concrete examples, which are used to illustrate how reflection can, and should, be a part of any formal learning experience.

Wellington, B., & Austin, P. (1996). Orientations to reflective practice. Educational Research, (38)3, 307-315.

The authors describe five orientations to reflective practice, as they relate to teacher education. The orientations range from working within, and supporting, organized structures, to that of more transformative education, wherein authoritative constraints are resisted and learning is inner-directed and focused on personal development. Within each orientation, reflective practices can be either domesticating—focusing on societal over individual needs, or liberating—that is, focusing on the individual over society. The authors then prescribe three questions that elicit a teacher’s orientation. As opposed to many of the articles I have read, this one does not advocate the value of one specific orientation; rather, the authors suggest that all orientations are valuable and can be used effectively, depending on the context. I found this article to be enlightening in that it presents the entire range of orientations to reflective practice. The article would be of specific interest to those exploring their own reflective practice and orientation.

Critical Reflection and Professional Development

Bierema, L.L. Moving beyond performance paradigms in human resource development. In A. L. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 278-293). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This article explores the impact of performance improvement within the field of human resource development. The authors strongly advocates a move away from HRD practices that focus strictly on goals related to corporate growth and towards the end of human growth. She discusses how HRD has shifted allegiance from humans to organizations through learning the peformativity movement, the discourse of performance improvement, questing credibility with management, and enhancing of power and control of the organization. She then proposes making HRD more socially responsible by challenging current assumptions via research, theory, and practice. I found this article to be illuminating due to its advocacy of a completely different approach to HRD than is currently practiced. While reading the article, I found myself questioning the motivation for corporations to be interested in ‘learning that affects the globe’ (p. 289) that would be the foundation for movement towards the advocated-for position. This article is a good place to start a discussion about the role of HRD within corporations.

Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1991). Experience and learning: Reflection at work. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved January 27, 2001, from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED384696)

This publication looks at learning from experience in the workplace and how to increase learning through reflection. Reflection, the authors propose, needs to take place during the learning event as well as afterwards for the event to be most effective. They focus on understanding and accommodating the learning milieu, which includes the learners’ previous experiences and their intent for attending to the learning experience. The article finishes by providing guidelines for the preparation for the experience and reflection afterwards. Quite lengthy, and in need of more concrete examples, this publication is useful for those seeking to encourage reflection-in-action.

Cheetham, G., & Chivers, G  (1998). The reflective (and competent) practitioner: A model of professional competence which seeks to harmonize the reflective practitioner and competence-based approaches. Journal of European Industrial Training, 22(2), 267-276.

The authors attempt to synthesize the various models that explain how professionals acquire and maintain their professional competences. They review a variety of approaches including the reflective practice, functional competence, personal competence, meta-competence and ethics approaches. They then describe the provisional model, which the authors themselves developed in 1996. This model integrates the others into a more holistic approach to professional competence. In this article, they review the feedback of the model, based on 80 practitioners from 20 different professions for feedback. The authors then revise the model to incorporate feedback received.  Though comprehensive, I found the original and revised models confusing. The visual provided of the original and revised models help to clarify a bit, but I needed to spend a great amount of time analyzing the model. It appears comprehensive, though perhaps too convoluted to provide a usable framework from which continuing education training can be improved. This article would best serve those advanced in their understanding of the various approaches discussed. It would also well serve those interested in a theoretical framework that synthesizes knowledge about professional competence.

Cunliffe, A. (1999). Critical pedagogy: Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. In C. H. J. Gilson, I. Arugulis, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Proceedings of Critical Management Studies Conference, Manchester School of Management, Management education and learning stream.

The author makes the case for the integration of reflexivity in managerial practice and training. The concepts of reflectivity and reflexivity were clearly defined and differentiated. An interesting aspect of the article was the discussion of learning as a result of being ‘struck’. Being struck opens the learners to new ways of thinking and acting. I found this article a bit repetitive and jargonized, even though I have read many articles of related content. The version I read was also missing the figures referred to throughout the article. This article is useful to those with a solid understanding of the language of reflection who are seeking validation for the importance of reflexivity in managerial education.

Daley, B. J. (2000). Learning in professional practice. In V. W. Mott & B. J. Daley (Eds.), Charting a course for continuing professional education: Reframing professional practice (pp. 33-41). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 86. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

The article starts by summarizing much of the research relating to challenges of transferring learning from the class to the workplace. The author then proposes a model of professional development that integrates constructivist and transformative approaches. The model also includes the context, rationale, and intuitive approaches to developing professional practice. Well-written, concise, and thoughtful, I found the model proposed to be holistic and realistic. To further the value of the article, the author presents a number of concrete techniques that would foster both a transformative and constructivist learning environment.

Epstein, R. M. (1999). Mindful practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(9), 833-839.

This article, written for medical practitioners, makes the case for critical reflection as a component of practitioner training and ongoing practice. Mindfulness in practice is seen as the link between "evidence-based and relationship-centered care and helps to overcome the limitations of both approaches." The author makes the case for mindfulness as integral to the professional competence of physicians, even though the research is largely personal and subjective. He further makes the case for the integration of both explicit and implicit knowledge and then goes on to classify different types of knowledge. An interesting aspect of the article are well-articulated goals of mindful practice, “The goals of mindful practice are to become more aware of one’s own mental processes, listen more attentively, become flexible, and recognize bias and judgments, and thereby act with principles and compassion." The author finishes the article by reviewing ways to become more self-aware, and advocating for the application of self-awareness to real-life situations faced by physicians. I found this an excellent article in demonstrating how critical reflection can make direct impact of the action of practitioners.

Ferraro, J. M. (2000). Reflective practice and professional development. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved January 21, 2002 from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED449120).

This article synthesizes much of the current understanding related to reflective practice and teacher education. Defining the concept, incorporating reflection into practice, and the benefits of reflective practice are covered. This is an excellent article to start off exploration into integrating reflective practice into teacher education. As valuable as the article is, the references are even more so. I used these as one of my starting points for discovering some of the seminal writing related to this topic.

Marsick, V. J. (1988). Learning in the workplace: The case for reflectivity and critical reflectivity, Adult Education, 38(4), 187-98.

This article questions the value of organizational training that focuses on strictly behaviour and skills. This article, though a bit dated, provides a solid argument in favour of integrating Mezirow’s three domains of learning (instrumental, dialogic, and self-reflective) into informal and formal learning in the workplace. The author presents a new (at the time) paradigm of workplace learning that incorporates all three of Mezirow’s domains of learning, using both formal and informal learning. One troubling aspect of the article was that formal training, in the paradigm presented, is limited to facilitating instrumental learning. I found this article to be succinct and focused. It would be valuable as a foundation for those interested in re-defining workplace learning.

O’Neil, J., & Marsick, V. J. (1994). Becoming critically reflective through action reflection learning. The emerging power of action inquiry technologies. (pp. 17-30). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 63. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

The article presents a framework for reflective learning in the workplace. It is well written and concise. Action Reflection Learning (ARL) encourages workplace learning, within a team, in the context of a real-time company project. The focus on reflection is evident in their use of strategies that encourage problem posing as opposed to problem solving. To a large extent this article is an excellent synopsis of general principles and strategies for encouraging workplace learning through reflection, though the term ‘Action Reflection Learning’ is trademarked. The fact that there seems to be little unique in their model makes me question the need for the trademarking of the term, other than marketing. Nonetheless, this article is a valuable reference for those considering integrating reflection in workplace learning. I would have like to see specific strategies (and examples thereof) used in ARL.

Seibert, K. W., & Daudelin, M. W. (1999). The role of reflection in managerial learning. Quorum: Westport, CT.

This book combines two studies on reflection in managerial learning to provide a holistic perspective of the role of reflection in the workplace. One of the studies looks at how managers use reflection in the workplace, in the midst of dealing with a problem or challenge. The other looks at techniques that foster the development of reflective abilities, before or after dealing with a problem or challenge in management settings. The book provides a good overview of concepts and theories of reflection in the workplace and in education. The rest of the book is devoted to descriptions and interpretation of the studies. Based on the studies, the authors develop conceptual models of the nature and development of reflection in management. I found this book somewhat long-winded, but informative and relevant to my area of study. I would recommend this book to those interested in exploring how reflection in the workplace takes place and how it can be further encouraged.

Fostering Critical Reflection

Brookfield, S. D. (1987). Being a skilled facilitator of critical thinking. In Developing critical thinkers: Challenging adults to explore alternative ways of thinking and acting (pp. 228-41). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This chapter provides a framework of the processes of critical thinking as well as general guidelines for facilitating the development of critical thinking skills as an adult educator. The guidelines presented reinforce many of the principles of facilitation already encouraged by many adult educators. The guidelines are too general for direct application. An interesting aspect of the chapter is the employment of a metaphor for describing the process of developing critical thinking skills. Finding commonalities between developing critical thinking skills and having a good (learning) conversation is enlightening and useful in understanding the individual and varied ways that critical thinking can be developed. Reading this chapter is encouragement to read the entire book, at least for those interested in further investigation in this topic area.

Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This book provides an excellent overview of the concept of reflective practice in teaching. The author also suggests concrete and practical strategies for incorporating reflective practice into the daily life of teacher practitioners and teacher training, based on his own experiences. It is clearly written and well organized. After outlining the importance of becoming critically reflective, the author provides strategies for developing self-reflective skills. He then lays out a process for helping to enhance the critical reflective skills of teachers in training, based on his own experience as a teacher-trainer. This is an excellent guide as I develop my own reflective skills and integrate reflection into my courses.  I would recommend this book to everyone interested in developing self-reflective skills as well as those looking to integrate reflective practices into course design, content and facilitation.

Cann, A., & Seale, J. K. (n.d.). How now mad cow: educating the reflective practitioner. Retrieved January 21, 2002 from http://www.liv.ac.uk/ctibiol/html/alan_cann.html

The authors of this site relate concepts of critical reflection to science education at university. Short, succinct and clear, the authors compare the technical rationale approach traditional to science education to a professional artistry approach and a competency-based approach to a reflective practice approach. They propose that perhaps at a undergraduate level, critical reflection is less important than at a graduate level. The authors then describe how they have adapted biology tutorials to incorporate reflective practice.  The best thing about this site is the point-by-point comparison of the different approaches. I found this helpful and useful, as will others grappling with the distinctions between a technical rationale and professional artistry.

Creme, P. (1999). A reflection on the education of the ‘critical person’. Teaching in Higher Education, (4)4, 461-471.

The authors puts into practice the theories and writings of Ronald Barnett. So much of the article quotes and summarizes Barnett that I was left feeling that I need to read Barnett, rather than this article. Creme brings to life the theories on fostering a holistic view of the critical person by integrating specific techniques into an interdisciplinary, seminar course on Death that are meant to test out Barnett’s theories. The approaches used by Creme are consistent with other readings and include journals, and group discussions. Certainly the most useful part of this article is the Barnett references, and the further validation of specific teaching approaches that can foster critical reflection.

 Daudelin, M. W., & Hall, D. T. (1997). Using reflection to leverage learning. Training and Development. (51)12, pp. 13-14.

The authors describe a very concrete method for incorporating critical reflection to enhance learning. Recommended for use after a meeting or conference, the authors ask a series of reflective questions, working individually, then in pairs, and finally in a large group discussion. The process they suggest takes about 45 minutes, which seems to be quite long relative to the instrumental learning that is generally focussed on in most conferences. They advocate the use of this amount of time based on the desired impact of assuring that information presented is remembered and used. I recommend this article as a guide for the integration of critical reflection into conferences and meetings.

Imel, S. (1998). Teaching critical reflection. Trends and issues alerts. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved January 27, 2002 from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429177)

This article is a short summary of the study of critical reflection. The most useful component of this article is the extensive bibliography. The author articulates the differences between reflection and critical reflection and lists the four elements of critical reflection as described by Brookfield. She briefly discusses the effect of integrating critical reflection in curricula based on Brookfield’s “tales from the dark side”. The author then describes the support needed to assist in the struggle students may experience engaging in critical reflection. This article should be used only as a starting point in the investigation of critical reflection.

Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (1998). Determining the level of reflective thinking from students written journals using a coding scheme based on the works of Mezirow. International Journal of Lifelong Learning, 18(1), 18-30.

This article attempts to quantify levels of reflective thinking. The authors use Mezirow’s levels of reflection to interpret journals of undergraduate health-care students. Though they experience some difficulties in the interpretation, the concept of empiricizing reflection in journals is intriguing. A large portion of the article discusses Mezirow’s levels of reflective thinking, and for this alone, the article is a worthwhile read. As I will attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating reflective thinking in course design and delivery, this article provides some direction as to how that might be accomplished. 

Matthews, B. & Jessel, J. (1998). Reflective and reflexive practice in initial teacher education: a critical case study. Teaching in Higher Education, (3)2, 231-243.

The authors start off by differentiating between the terms ‘reflection’ and ‘reflexivity’. They then describe their efforts to promote reflection and reflexivity with 40 students in a teacher education program in the U.K. To provide opportunities for reflection, students participated in a number of reflective assignments while on teaching practice. Through the assessment of student written work, and questionnaires completed, the authors determine that reflection can be promoted and does enhance learning. This article well-articulates a specific methodology for encouraging and assessing reflection, and thus would make a good resource in the integration of reflection into higher education.

Meyer, S. (1992). Cultivating reflection-in-action in trainer development. Adult Learning, (3)4, 16-31.

This article looks at facilitating reflection-in-action skills in trainer development through curriculum review and videotaping actual training sessions for review. Meyer proposes that by using a variety of reflective questions trainers can be encouraged to be more aware of their professional values and attitudes and how these are expressed in action. The process of developing more reflective practice is highly dependent on facilitator effectiveness. Very few qualitative examples are given and explicit description of the process used was not detailed. Though useful in general, this article was not specific enough to be used as a guide in developing a program for cultivating reflection-in-action.

Morrison, K. (1996). Developing reflective practice in higher degree students through a learning journal. Studies in higher education, (21)3, 317- 330.

In this article, the author looks at how learning journals are used to encourage reflection in higher education modular programmes. The author lays out two models of reflection, one based on Schön’s reflection-on-action and reflection-in-action, and the other based on Habermas, much more political in nature. The article then proceeds to lay out the ways in which the learning journal can be used to help students become more reflective with both models of reflective practice. The author completes the article with a discussion of how to evaluate learning journals. I found this article quite useful for those with an understanding of reflection and who want practical ways to structure the keeping of learning journals to meet the goals of the two models discussed. I found this article quite unique in its integration of two approaches to reflective practice and thoughtful in the application of a learning journal to encourage reflection.

 Newman, J. M. (1987). Learning to teach by uncovering our assumptions. Language Arts, (64)7, 727-737.

The author uses critical incidents to uncover hidden assumptions in teaching. Using a teacher-trainer class, which she facilitated, the author has students come prepared with critical incident from their own teaching experiences to help work through some of the tacit assumptions that guide teaching. Though the incidents are related to grade school education, there is much that is applicable to adult educators. Not organized by clear themes or types of assumptions, the author demonstrates how to use critical incidents in the development of critical reflection in the teachers in the course. This article is an interesting read, if a bit shallow in process and content. Still, it is a good, quick read that adds to knowledge about using critical incidents to further develop critical reflection.

 Pavlovic, S., & Friedland, B. (1997).  Reflectivity in supervision and teaching. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved February 21, 2001, from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED406115)

In this article, the authors describe a study of 7 preservice teachers in the use of reflective practice in the development of lessons. The techniques used included reflective pre- and post-tests, reflective conversations with their supervisor, journals, videotapes of educational activities, and a development plan. It appears that over the 12 weeks of the study, no significant improvement in reflective practice was demonstrated. The article discusses potential barriers to the development of reflective practice. The authors end the article with suggestions related to the supervisory role in encouraging reflective practice. I found this article somewhat unique in that they attempted to quantify the reflectivity in each of the reflective activities used. Unfortunately, I found there was not enough description (or examples) of how the quantification was determined. I also wonder what conclusions can be drawn from this positivist study, as only 7 students were involved. This article is somewhat advanced, and would most benefit those who already have solid understanding of reflective practice.

Reynolds, M. (1997). Towards a critical management pedagogy. In J. Burgoyne & M Reynolds (Eds.), Management learning: Integrating perspectives in theory and practice (pp. 312-328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

This article develops the case for incorporating a critical reflection perspective and strategies into business management education. Reynolds provides a well-rounded overview of the characteristics and importance of a critical perspective as well as concrete approaches and techniques that might be effective. He argues that both content and methodology inform the development of critical reflection skills. A practical, well-written article, the article serves those seeking to do what the article proposes; bring to life a critical perspective for business management education.

Schön. D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. In a speech to the American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC. Retrieved January 21, 2002 from http://hci.stnford.edu/other/Schön87.html.

Schön synthesizes his theories related to reflection-in-action and of his 1983 book, “Educating the Reflective Practitioner.” He uses his knowledge of the perspective and approach of elementary schools to suggest moving away from the technical rationality approach to one that is more based on the real and varied ways that individuals learn which he calls “professional artistry”. He clearly lays out what he believes the role of the teacher should be. He also presents suggestions for making the transition from the perspective of technical rationality to professional artistry. This speech, though clearly directed at educators of children, is an excellent summary of the full-length book of the same name, and is a much easier read. For those interested in his perspective and concepts, but not interested in reading his entire book, this is a great resource.

Stein, D. (2000). Myths and realities no. 7: Teaching critical reflection. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved January 21, 2002 from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 445256).

This precis summarizes the studies related to teaching critical reflection. Succinct and clear, the author provides a balanced view of the promise of teaching critical reflection. He reviews methods of teaching critical reflection, levels of reflections, limitations, and the transfer of critically reflective skills from the classroom to the ‘real world’. Of most use are the references, which list up-to-date research and writings on critical reflection. This is a good article with which to begin.

Taylor, E. W. (2000). Fostering transformative learning in the adult education classroom: A review of the empirical studies. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved Feb 11, 2003 from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED442989).

This literature review looks at the practice of fostering transformative learning in the classroom, based on Mezirow’s concepts of promoting rational discourse and critical reflection. The author identifies several of the essential practices culled from research of over 35 articles. He then details six themes related to fostering transformative learning, grouping most of the studies reviewed therein. His synthesis of the literature is quite relevant to those incorporating transformative practices in the classroom. Missing in the article are concrete strategies for incorporating the themes into classroom instruction.

Research Methods

Bullough, Jr. R. V. and Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13-21.

This article articulates guidelines that are intended to ensure that self-study is a rigorous form of qualitative research. The authors start by identifying four influences that have brought about the increasing acceptance of self-study as a valid research method, firmly ensconcing self-study within the postmodern tradition. They then lay out and describe 14 guidelines that help to ground self-study in value and meaning for improving educational practices as well as a form of research. While most of the guidelines are generic to any self-study, they do include a section that is specific to correspondence, email, and recorded conversations. What is unclear about this is that other forms of self-study data, like journals and artifacts of practice are not specified. I was left wondering what was so unique about the specified forms of data that required special mention. This article is a great starting point for those who are novice with this form of research.

Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (2000). From field to field texts. In Narrative Inquiry (pp. 80-91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This chapter advocates for the use of field texts as a way to manage many of the obstacles that a narrative inquirer may encounter. Obstacles described include distance versus intimacy, how memory of an experience can lose details over time, and the interpretive aspect of the reader in her current space and time, versus the writer’s experience of meaning making. The authors strongly advocate for the use and archiving of field texts. However, it is in the chapter afterwards where field texts are defined and discussed, which seems to be poorly sequenced for the novice inquirer.

Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Thinking narratively: a case at the boundaries. In Narrative Inquiry (pp. 21-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This chapter elicits differences between traditional and postmodern perspectives as evidenced through a narrative approach. The narrative used to elicit the differences was based on the authors’ work in revising Bloom’s Taxonomy. Clandinin and Connelly reflect on the tensions between those of the revision team who put forward a ‘grand narrative’ and their own narrative-driven approach. They articulate 5 key attributes of a narrative approach (temporality, people, action, certainty, and context). I found this chapter to be an excellent way to understand how narrative is firmly grounded in a postmodernist approach, by contrasting it with more traditional approaches. The tensions identified elicit key characteristics of narratives that seem theoretically grounded and useful in application. 

Day, C. (1999). Researching teaching through reflective practice. In Researching teaching: Methodologies and practice for understanding pedagogy (pp. 215-231). UK: Biddles Ltd.

This article outlines different types of critical reflection and the importance to of reflection for teachers in the sustaining and building of quality teaching practices and attitudes over the career of a teacher. The author then articulates some of the personal, professional, and systemic obstacles to incorporating and maintaining reflective practice. The article ends with a model of reflective professionalism, embracing communities of practice and a partnership between schools and teachers which might create opportunities for ongoing reflection. I found that this article clearly outlined some of the challenges for creating an environment that fosters critical reflection. Unfortunately, the solution offered was very general and did not directly respond to challenges outlined. 

Feldman, A. (2003). Validity and quality in self-study. Educational Researcher, (32)3, 26-28.

This article is a response to Bullough and Pinnegar’s "Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study". Where the Bullough and Pinnegar article focuses on quality of self-study, Feldman puts forth that the issue of validity in self-study as research must be dealt with in order to be more widely accepted. The author makes the argument that self-study as scholarly work is intended to have direct impact on teachers, schools, and students, and therefore is both political and moral. And out of this reasoning comes the needs to ensure that the research has validity. He then goes on to list four suggestions for increasing the validity of self-study. There seems to be a lot of background and making the argument for more validity, but little attention paid to the suggestions the author makes for increasing validity. I wish there had been more detail to his list and a few examples to help make his point.

Imel, S., Kerka, S. & Wonacott, M. (2002). Qualitative research in adult, career, and career-technical education. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved February, 2003, from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED472366).

This comprehensive guide to qualitative research is extremely useful as a starting point for those with a foundation in research methods. The authors briefly describe qualitative research, provide guidelines for using qualitative methods, and describe types of common methods, approaches, and examples. The guide also includes annotated references and a glossary of related terms. There is a tremendous amount of content provided, and I had to read it several times to clearly understand the differences and uses of each method described. For this reason, having a basic understanding of qualitative research is of great benefit. This article is best used for further investigation into qualitative methods of research.

 Karpiak, I.E. (2003). The ethnographic, the reflective and the uncanny. Journal of Transformative Education. 1(2), 99-116.

In this article, the author uses a hierarchical (psychoanalytic) model to better illuminate the depth to which her students strive in writing their personal autobiographies as a part of a graduate course. Using case studies of autobiographies and follow-up interviews, Karpiak includes samples of student writing and her interpretation applying to the writings of Britzman (1998), which include ethnographic, reflective and uncanny. The value of this article is evident for those trying to interpret the writings of their own and others, and for encouraging a deepening of reflection in narratives.

Kuzma, F. I. (1994). Two voices are better than one: A dialogic use of the dialogue journal. Washington, DC: Department of Education. Retrieved February 6, 2002 from the ERIC database. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED381796).

This article is a review of the use of dialogic journals in considering alternate viewpoints in any social discourse. Written in context of feminism and acquaintance rape, the article discusses the advantages of such a journal.  Written in part as literature and in part as a ‘how-to’, the author clearly sees many advantages to the use of a dialogic journal while reviewing few of the disadvantages. The directions for writing a dialogic journal are clear and concise and can act as a guide for someone attempting to write in this style for the first time. The feminist focus of the article demonstrates concretely how this type of journaling can offer a safe place from which to explore the tension between objectivity and subjectivity, certainty and speculation.

Loughran, J. (2005). Researching teaching about teaching: self-study of teacher education practices. Studying Teacher Education, 1(1), 5-16.

This inaugural article in the augural issue by the editor of the journal is a literature review of self-study in the context of teacher educators. The author describes the evolution of the methodology of self-study and goes on to discuss the methodology in the context of teacher education. Loughran then describes three cases, each longitudinal in nature, that used different approaches to capture learning from self-study: eliciting axioms, tensions, and assertions of practice. The article seems primarily geared towards those charged with preparing novice teachers for k-12 classroom experiences, though lessons for faculty development and ongoing improvements of teaching practices can be easily extrapolated.

Moon, J. (1999). Learning journals: a handbook for academics, students and professional development. London: Kogan Page.

This handbook is a comprehensive guide to using learning journals to enhance learning. Moon systematically describes the ways one can learn from journalling, purposes, starting, monitoring, and assessing journals, and a review of styles of journals for professional and personal development. This book also lays out different formats of journals, and provides examples. Though a bit repetitive, there are many importnat and relevant ideas and examples. I especially appreciated the sections describing how critical reflection can be enhanced with the use of learning journals. I would recommend this book to those interested in using journalling in any formal learning setting.

The Qualitative Report. (n.d). Retrieved March 17, 2003 from  http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/index.html.

This online journal is dedicated to qualitative research. It has a huge collection of articles and links to other qualitative research sites. I found the number of links overwhelming. The journal articles were not annotated either, making locating specific information nearly impossible, though I was able to locate relevant articles using the internal search function. I found myself spending over half a day searching the site for samples of written surveys.

Stapleton Watson, J., Wilcox, S. (2000). Reading for understanding: methods of reflecting on practice. Reflective Practitioner. 1(1). pp. 57-67.

This article outlines two methods for reflecting on practice, one that based on an experience that is problematic and another based on practices that are routine. The authors present a three-step process for reflecting on either, that can be described as a quick reading, zooming in, and zooming out. This process is presented quite simply and illustrated with examples. It seems that though the process is simple, carrying out the suggested steps would be provide for a thorough and reflective understanding of one’s own practices. It would seem, however, that following the process prescribed would be much more difficult than presented, and the article would be even more helpful if it presented the potential obstacles and challenges.

Professional Continuing Education

Cervero, R. M. (1988). Effective Continuing Education for Professionals. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

The author attempts to identify elements of effective practice in continuing professional education. These elements include ethical practices, concepts of professionals as learners and participants, the institutional context of practice, and approaches to program development and evaluation. He discusses each of these from a critical viewpoint, which advocates the use of reflection in all continuing professional education activities. Each topic covered describes traditional viewpoints and then synthesizes them into a more holistic critical perspective. This is a good overview of the conflicting approaches to adult education, though I found his argument for a critical perspective a bit repetitive and obvious, given other readings on continuing professional education. His perspective is clearly the most accepted, at least in the writings on continuing professional education, if not in practice. This book is well written and concise. It is a good resource for those at the beginning of their knowledge building related to continuing professional education.

Cervero, R. M. (1992). Professional practice, learning, and continuing education: An integrated perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, (11)2, 91-101.

The author presents a strong case for the integration of  practical methods of instruction in the delivery of continuing professional education. The author differentiates between declarative knowledge (facts, generalizations, etc.) and procedural knowledge (contextual and dynamic). In essence, the former is considered academic and the latter is based on practice. He makes the case that traditonally, continuing education focuses on declarative knowledge, while the primary need of continuing education for professionals is procedural. The value of procedural knowledge is that it is time-bound and situation specific and can only be acquired by engaging in practice or simulations in practice. This article is a good starting point for newcomers to the literature of continuing professional education as the author clearly defines key terms and concepts. The author connects the realities of continuing professional education to the need for reflective practices as a key component for wise action. Although the article argues for what seems to be common sense, it provides a clear rationale. For this reason alone, it is an excellent article.

Cervero, R. M. (2000). Trends and issues in continuing professional education. In V. W. Mott & B. J. Daley (Eds.), Charting a course for continuing professional education: Reframing professional practice (pp. 3-12). New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, No. 86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This author discusses trends and issues that currently face continuing professional education. Most of the article is framed by the first trend discussed; that the large majority of continuing education is offered at the workplace. Cervero is an advocate for practice-oriented continuing professional education, as opposed to the knowledge and skills acquisition model that has dominated the field for most of it existence. This clearly written and helpful article presents a good overview of the role and opportunities afforded to continuing professional education, as well as some of the pitfalls. An easy read and good synopsis, this article would be beneficial to anyone interested in getting an overview of continuing professional education.

Queeney, D. S. (2000), Continuing professional education. In A. L. Wilson & E. R. Hayes (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp.375-391). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Advocating “practice-oriented” Continuing Professional Education, this article, as evidenced by the fact that it is a part of the Handbook of Adult and Continuing Education, would seem to be ‘preaching to the converted’. As she defines it, practice-oriented continuing professional education not only focuses on the technical knowledge and skills needed to be an effective practitioner, but also on the need to continually develop intra- and inter-professional teams, generalizable problem-solving skills and a high degree of flexibility and adaptability. Given the emerging trend to a more holistic approach of workplace learning, I cannot imagine too many practitioners arguing against this approach. Queeney, somewhat repetitively, puts forth the argument that practitioners must ensure that that there is a demonstrable link between continuing professional education and workplace practice. she puts forth strategies for successful continuing professional education: effective partnerships, assessment and evaluation and a greater understanding of the context of CPE. Unfortunately, she does present an incomplete history of continuing professional education and a just a smattering of current challenges. She discusses the importance of distance education as an emerging delivery vehicle, without discussing other methodologies. This article would be most appropriate for someone who has little idea of what continuing professional education is, nor a solid grounding in contemporary adult education principles and practices.

Sheid, F.M., Caret, V.K., and Howell, S.L. (2001). Silent power: HRD and the management of learning in the workplace. In Power and practice: Adult education and the struggle for knowledge and power in society (pp.42-59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

This article uses a case study as a means to propose that educational practices in organizations can become processes of domination and a means to manufacture consent. Although this article piqued my interest, I was left wondering how one uncovers the culture of power and domination within any organization. No systematic approach to uncovering issues related to power was presented and this left me wanting more.