Skip to main content
Skip to main content
  • About the Office of Research
  • Welcome Message
  • Meet the Vice-President (Research)
  • Strategic Research Plan
  • Mission Statement
  • Services and Divisions
  • Discover our Research
  • Research Chairs
  • Facts and Figures
  • Centres, Institutes, and Groups
  • International Research
  • Find a Researcher
  • Core Research Facilities
  • For Researchers
  • Safeguarding Research
  • Commercialization Policy and Framework
  • Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Research
  • Research Alerts
  • Funding
  • Ethics and Regulatory Compliance
  • Research Integrity and Conflict of Interest
  • Patenting, Licensing, and Commercialization
  • Honours and Awards
  • Ontario Agri-Food Innovation Alliance
  • Other Considerations and Resources
  • Forms, Policies, Guidelines, and Procedures
  • Interactive Support Sessions for Researchers
  • Researcher Training and Development
  • Research Administration Information Management System (RAIMS)
  • For Students
  • Academic Programs
  • Research Opportunities
  • Student Entrepreneurs
  • For Partners
  • Opportunities for Collaboration
  • Patenting, Licensing, and Commercialization
  • Find a Researcher
  • Research Services
  • Contact Us
  • Office of the Vice-President (Research & Innovation)
  • Research Services Office
  • Agri-Food Partnership staff
  • Research Innovation Office staff
  • Food from Thought staff
  • College Associate Deans Research and Research Managers
  • Research Financial Services

Reframing Vaccine Hesitancy

Posted on Wednesday, January 8th, 2020
Prof. Maya Goldenberg

SPARK writer Karli Longthorne (left) reviews research material with Prof. Maya Goldenberg.

 

By Karli Longthorne

Despite strong scientific evidence supporting the merits of vaccines, some members of the public still feel hesitant towards using them. The common thinking by journalists, public health advocates, medical personnel, and the general public is that vaccine naysayers don’t understand science.

But University of Guelph philosophy professor Maya Goldenberg sees it differently. She believes vaccine hesitancy among parents of young children is caused by low levels of trust in scientists and the health system.

“It's not a science problem, or a knowledge deficit problem, but more of a social problem,” says Goldenberg. She says the question that needs to be asked is why clusters of people in the world that don't accept scientific consensus as legitimate?

Goldenberg says contrary to popular belief, vaccine-hesitant individuals are often educated and affluent. Educated individuals apply their critical thinking skills to develop strong beliefs either in favour or against vaccines. The result is very polarized views on the subject.

Further, she says, wealthy parents have more resources to protect their children from potential sickness, which might cause them to believe they are also able to protect their children from contracting a communicable disease.

Vaccine-hesitant individuals are often uncomfortable with relationships between academe and industry, value natural lifestyles, and often have had bad experiences with biomedicine, causing them to search for alternative remedies says Goldenberg. Often individuals are wary about the credibility of scientific claims if they believe these claims are guided by industry-funded research. Individuals who ascribe to “natural” living might view vaccines negatively because they don’t fit with their values.

“If these findings about how people interact with science are correct, it tells us that the current public health outreach and communications is misguided,” she says. “So the scientific literature is not going to convince people who are wary about the credibility of scientific claims.” 

Using philosophy of science, bioethics, politics and social theory, Goldenberg aims to promote more productive health care outreach and communication efforts. Some trust-building measures mentioned in Goldenberg’s new book, A Crisis of Trust? Vaccine Hesitancy, Science, and Public Debate (University of Pittsburgh Press, forthcoming 2020) includes developing points of convergence to gain the trust of people who are vaccine hesitant to have more productive conversations about vaccines.

Also, she says, breaking down the association between natural living and vaccination practices might help make the case that you can live a natural lifestyle and still vaccinate your kids.

“If we can come up with better vaccine communications that promote trust and increase confidence in vaccines then we've got a better public health situation and a healthier population,” says Goldenberg. “Viewing individuals as lacking scientific understanding is unproductive, as it creates a hostile environment for hesitant individuals to bring forth their concerns about vaccines, while further decreasing their trust in science.”

Printer-friendly version
Skip to main content

Who We Are

The Office of Research oversees a $186 million research enterprise across seven colleges, our regional campus at Ridgetown, 15 research centres, and the University of Guelph/Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Agreement. We are committed to supporting the research programs of University of Guelph faculty across all disciplines.

more...

Quick Links

  • OR-5 form
  • Animal Utilization Protocol online system (eAUP)
  • Human Participants - Ethics Online System (EthOS)
  • Funding Opportunities list

Find Us on Social Media


  • X - Twitter

  • YouTube - YouTube

  • Facebook - Facebook

  • Instagram